Home

Introduction to NOUFORS

What's New

Products

Forum

Michel M. Deschamps - Director

Personal Sightings

Sightings Archive

Newspaper Archive

UFOs

UFO Characteristics

UFO Physical Traces

Animal Mutilations

UFO Occupants

Crop Circles

Audio Clips

Documents

Majestic-12

Politicians
and UFOs

Military Officers
and UFOs

Scientists and UFOs

Astronauts and UFOs

Pilots and UFOs

Cops and Saucers

Celebrities and UFOs

Who's Who in
UFOlogy

Skeptics and Debunkers

Encyclopedia of Terminology and Abbreviations

Kidz' Korner

Links

Recommended
Reading

Recommended
Viewing

Part 2: Implications of John Burroughs's Full V. A. Medical Coverage
from Injury Caused by Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP)
Radiation at RAF Bentwaters/Woodbridge, Dec. 1980

© 2015 by Linda Moulton Howe

 

"The Project Condign report is the closest thing to a smoking gun
that’s out there right now, next to the fact of recovering a craft."

- John Burroughs, USAF Tech Sgt. (Ret.)

 


Computer illustration of sketch by John Burroughs of unidentified
aerial phenomena (UAP or UFO) in Rendlesham Forest, 3 AM,
December 26, 1980. Artwork by John Rackham.

 

Return to Part 1.

February 27, 2015 Albuquerque, New Mexico - Continuing interview with John Burroughs. See video of 2015 Researcher of the Year Award to John in More Information below.


Interview:

Howe 022615 John Burroughs.mp3

John Burroughs, retired USAF Tech Sgt., Normal, Illinois:

"IT IS SIGNIFICANT THAT PROJECT CONDIGN THAT WAS HIGHLY CLASSIFIED AND THEN RELEASED WITHIN THIS DECADE SORT OF QUIETLY SAYS THAT THIS UAP PHENOMENA — THAT IN THE UNITED STATES WE WOULD CALL ‘UFO’ AND THE BRITISH ARE CALLING ‘UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL PHENOMENON’ — EMITS SOME KIND OF RADIATION THAT CAN EFFECT MINDS AND BODIES. THAT IS A DISSCUSSION IN PROJECT CONDIGN.

Right, it’s a high spectrum radiation in the terahertz range and that this type of radiation is highly classified within the Dept. of Defense and even in the MoD. What I mean by classified is terahertz is out there. It’s being used in the white world (airport security scanners). But it (UAP frequencies) is also being worked on in the black world. This type of radiation is being looked at for weaponization in a lot of different ways, which is classified."

 

Spectrum of Ionizing to Non-Ionizing
Electromagnetic Radiation


Terahertz waves (where thin black lines above point) lie at the far end of the infrared band (red),
just before the start of the microwave band (grey and pink). Left to right in the graphic
above are .01 nanometer (1 billionth of a meter) ionizing radiation; 1 nm ionizing x-rays
and 100 nm ionizing ultraviolet. Then non-ionizing frequencies are visible light in which human
eyes see; non-ionizing infrared; 1 millimeter (1 thousandth of a meter) non-ionizing terahertz
radiation; 1m non-ionizing microwaves; and 1 km non-ionizing radiowaves and
extremely low frequencies. Graphic by Spectre.sfg.

Ionizing alpha, beta and gamma rays, x-rays and ultraviolet rays have enough energy to strip off tightly bound electrons from atoms, which are ions. Thus, ionizing radiation can do serious damage to human and other Earth life tissues.

Non-ionizing radiation that has enough energy to move atoms in a molecule around or cause them to vibrate, but not enough to remove electrons, is referred to as "non-ionizing radiation." Examples of these frequencies are the visible light spectrum, infrared, terahertz, microwaves, radio and extremely low frequencies. Current civilian world uses of non-ionizing radiation include terahertz airport body scanners, microwaves for telecommunications and heating food and liquids; infrared lamps to keep food warm in restaurants; and radio waves broadcasting.

 

UAP Radiation -
How Does It Damage Human Tissues?

“JOHN, TERAHERTZ LIES BETWEEN MICROWAVE AND INFRA RED ON THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM. HAS ANYBODY SO FAR TALKED TO YOU ABOUT WHAT IT IS THAT THE TERAHERTZ MIGHT BE ABLE TO DO TO YOUR HEART VALVE, GIVEN THE FACT THAT TERAHERTZ IS SUPPOSED TO BE NON-IONIZING AND THEREFORE NOT DAMAGING TO TISSUE?

The best I can tell you on this is that it was clear once this information was made available, all of a sudden the doctors knew what to look for and they did some more testing (on me). Prior to that (classified information provided about UAP radiation exposure at RAF Bentwaters in Dec. 1980), my civilian doctors could not understand a guy of my health overall — my heart was healthy other than the fact that it was being damaged because it kept going into A fib (atrial fibrillation) and congestive heart failure. They (civilian doctors) could not understand why it was doing that because there was no reason for it. They could not get to the bottom of it. That’s when they requested my military records in the first place and were denied.

Basically once this (UAP radiation exposure) information became available, everything expedited and within a short period of time — you know, within a 3-month period — I was completely treated and they figured out what was wrong. They went in and did this surgery and my life was saved. I credit that to Senator John McCain’s office and to a doctor that was behind the scenes that gave information to the doctors in the V. A., who then knew what to look for and were able to do life saving surgery.

THE DAMAGE TO THE SHREDDED LEAFLET IN YOUR HEART HAS BEEN LINKED DIRECTLY BACK TO YOUR EXPOSURE TO UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL PHENOMENA RADIATION.

Yes. That was the basis of the whole claim. I mean, originally it was, ‘I need my medical records for the civilian doctors.’ It was denied. Then along the way, it became clear to the people involved trying to get my records that they were most likely classified. They (V. A. workers) were the ones that stated that.

To this day, my medical records were not released to me in this (V. A.) settlement. I am not allowed to see them. I am not allowed to have access to them, nor was my FOIA answered. My FOIA was, ‘I want a confirmation from the Department of Defense and the V. A. Are my records classified? Do they lie within the classified section? Where are my medical records being held?’

That (FOIA) has also been ignored, which is a violation of federal law. They (gov’t) have to acknowledge a FOIA and they didn’t!

But the bottom line is that my medical claim was based on the facts that:

— I was injured in the line of duty.

— That I became sick right after the incident.

— Which was the reason why I had my heart issues.

— Here’s the Condign proof that this incident happened.

— And not only that, but the Condign proof shows that my heart was damaged by whatever I was exposed to in the Rendlesham Forest in December 1980.

 

Physical Illness Symptoms Soon
After Rendlesham Forest Encounters

JOHN, HOW SOON AFTER DECEMBER 28, 1980, DID YOU HAVE A MEDICAL EXAM WHEN YOU WERE AT RAF BENTWATERS-WOODBRIDGE?

The interesting thing is that I never had a medical exam per se where they found the issue at Bentwaters. But I did not feel good right after the incident and I struggled with different things — vision, throat and some other problems, but they never found the heart issue.

It was after I returned to the United States four or five months later that again I got sick, just out of the blue, completely got sick and I went into the civilian hospital. My heart was not acting properly. They found a heart murmur and there was an abnormal anomaly in the heart. And the interesting thing about that, which I didn’t know at the time, but I’ve learned over the years, is a lot of times when they find this heart murmur anomaly in the heart and do an EKG and stuff like that, that leads to you have some kind of heart blockage.

But I never had that. As a matter of fact, prior to my surgery (Dec. 2013), the doctors checked for that, in case they were going to have to clean out my arteries, and they were clean. I have no heart disease, no heart problems, no nothing. The only heart problem I have was that both of my leaflets were shredded. But the one that normally doesn’t even have any damage in the mitral valve was completely shredded, which was on the inside of my mitral valve. And that was causing all my heart issues.

IT IS DESCRIBED IN PROJECT CONDIGN THAT EXPOSURE TO UAP RADIATION — HOWEVER IT IS DEFINED AT WHAT FREQUENCY — CAN CAUSE DAMAGE TO THE BODY AND CAN MANIPULATE THE MIND.

Yeah, it can, it states that in the report. People need to read that report.
[See hot links below to Condign Report ANNEX F.]

The Project Condign report is the closest thing to a smoking gun that’s out there right now, next to the fact of recovering a craft. And what I mean by that is to have proof of a craft. I mean there are implications that the crafts have been recovered and I’m not saying they haven’t been. But no one in the public has got that proof, as far as I know. But this is a report and it was a highly classified intelligence study on UFOs.

 

"UAP" Acronym Used by MoD
to Avoid FOIA Requests About UFOs

What is interesting, too, within some other work that I’ve done where I’ve got the MoD to admit they are still holding back 18 files — these are some of the policy files that they are holding back — six of them (policy files) and in fact, 18 files overall withheld.

Originally the MoD used ‘UFOs.’ And then later on, all of a sudden they (MoD) changed it to UAPs.

THAT UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL PHENOMENA ACRONYM MEANS THAT EVERYBODY FILING FOIA FOR ‘UFO’ CAN HONESTLY BE DISMISSED OR IGNORED BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT TECHNICALLY FILING FOR ‘UAP.’

Right. I was able to get them to admit that they (MoD) still withheld these 18 files and some other stuff that I’m still holding on to. But they’ve gotten to the point now because of my follow up questions, they will not even answer anymore of my questions. They (MoD) used this reasoning — they said, ‘We are no longer going to discuss which files we are holding, what interdepartmental memos, emails or anything else involved in this case until after these 18 files are released.’

Well, after the V. A. reviewed all my documents and everything that was presented to them, it appears that they have had some type of access to my medical records (because) they agreed that I was injured in the line of duty; that I deserved compensation and to be taken care of for my injuries in the line of duty in the forest of Rendlesham in 1980. Which all goes back to Project Condign, the UAP radiation and that other MoD DI55 report acknowledging that we were exposed to above background radiation.

Now, when I first got them (MoD) to admit to these (withheld) files, they were supposed to release them last Fall or early Winter 2014. But then when a British citizen — that’s how they magically released all of this where they didn’t acknowledge the fact that they had admitted that to me. They had a British citizen who had read some of my work that was put out — or some of the work that’s been done with my colleagues, too, that’s been put out — that he made another request supposedly, and then they (MoD) admitted, ‘Yeah, well, we’re holding on to 18 files and we’re going to release them eventually. The tentative release date will be sometime at the end of this year (2015). But there have been follow up FOIAs since then. Mine were not acknowledged, as usual, but somebody else did not get a response back either on when they (MoD) plan on releasing these (18) files, which I think are important and one of the things I think they are going to have a problem with this time is there’s going to be more people wanting to know what’s redacted and why it’s redacted.

Before, they just kind of seemed to get away with it. They just kind of said, ‘Well, here you go, guys, this is it. We don’t have anymore. And this is what we know and it’s no big deal. Well, now, if they claim they claim they released everything — that’s not true. That’s one of those: ‘I’m never going to tell you a total lie, but I’m never going to tell you the whole truth’ type of scenario.

What they are doing is saying, ‘Here’s what we can release. Here’s what’s redacted. Here’s what’s de-classified now, but there’s still a lot still classified within this that we’re not going to release.’

Why would they do that? Why would they still hold it (some files) back? Because it’s still of defense significance.

 

Is UAP Radiation in the Black World
Being Used in Weapon Systems?

WHY DO YOU THINK THAT IT IS NOT PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED THAT WE’RE NOT ALONE IN THE UNIVERSE AND THAT OTHER INTELLIGENCES HAVE BEEN INTERACTING WITH THIS PLANET FOR A LONG TIME?

My gut feeling is that it’s written within Project Condign itself. It’s the fact that everybody’s in a race to weaponize this technology. What I mean is the major world powers. That particular technology — this would be the next game changer.

Not only is it a game changer for whoever would hold the technology and be able to utilize it the best — but then also, is there a real threat from outside? In my case, it is unknown. When I was hurt, was it intentional or not? I can’t answer that. I mean, it could be just as simple as what happened when the Europeans came over to America and the North American Indians were exposed to them for the first time and there was stuff (germs) within what they had and carried that caused disease and sickness. It could just be as simple as that was what happened to me.

But then, there could be more implications to it. There are definitely reports of things that have happened where there has been some kind of exchange (with UAPs). So not only would it benefit the countries of the world to understand this technology if there is a threat from above. But it would also benefit whoever had the best ability to use this technology to rule the world itself.”

 

"I wish to make it perfectly clear that the UFOs that I saw were structured
machines moving under intelligent control and operating beyond the realm of anything
I have ever seen before or since. I believe the objects that I saw at close quarter were
extraterrestrial in origin and that the security services of both the United States
and England were and have been complicit in trying to subvert the significance
of what occurred at Rendlesham by use of well-practiced methods of disinformation."

- Col. Charles Halt (Ret.), June 25, 2009 Press Release


Lt. Col. Charles I. Halt described a mysterious aerial light above
Rendlesham Forest that emitted several thin, white beams down to the ground,
including one right in front of his own feet as he stood next to Staff Sergeant
Monroe Nevels in the early morning hours of December 28, 1980. Illustration
by Jan Roth at www.rendlesham-incident.co.uk used with permission.

 

Project Condign Hot Links

Click purple hot link (takes a few seconds): Page F-4 and 14 other pages,
Vol. 2 ANNEX F - “Non-Ionising EM Effects On Humans” and “Potential Mental Effects On Humans”

Click purple hot link for May 15, 2006, declassified and released:
U. K. The National Archives, for hot links to UAP Executive Summary; Volume 1; Volume 2; and Volume 3.

October 30, 2014 Earthfiles: "Updated - USAF Tech Sgt. (Ret.) John Burroughs Has Forced U. K. Ministry of Defence to Admit It Withheld At Least 18 Classified UFO Files": https://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=2243&category=Environment

May 4, 2011 Earthfiles: “8,500 More UFO Pages Released by U. K. Ministry of Defence - But RAF Bentwaters Files Are Missing”:
http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1822&category=Environment

 

Return to Part 1.

 

More Information:

Video - 2015 Open Minds Researcher of the Year Award to John Burroughs.

 

For further information about the RAF Bentwaters/Woodbridge AFB phenomenon in December 1980 onward, please see Earthfiles Archive:

• 02/23/2015 — Update with Press Release - John Burroughs Has Received Full V. A. Medical Coverage Due to Injury Caused by Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) Radiation at RAF Bentwaters/Woodbridge in December 1980

• 10/30/2014 — Updated: USAF Tech Sgt. (Ret.) John Burroughs Has Forced U. K. Ministry of Defence to Admit It Withheld At Least 18 Classified UFO Files
• 05/15/2014 — Press Release from Retired USAF Staff Sgt. John Burroughs: “British MoD Withholding Secret UFO Documents.”

• 12/20/2013 — Updated Part 2: Anomalous Radiation in RAF Bentwaters Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
• 12/19/2013 — Why Is Veterans Administration Blocking Access to USAF Medical Records - Even to Request by U. S. Senator John McCain (R-Ariz)?

• 03/04/2011 — 8,500 More UFO Pages Released Today by U. K. Ministry of Defence - But RAF Bentwaters Files Are Missing
• 01/28/2011 — RAF Bentwaters Update After December 2010 Return to Rendlesham Forest with Former USAF John Burroughs and Jim Penniston
• 01/07/2011 — Part 4: Updates On RAF Bentwaters Mystery - Analysis Problems in Penniston's Telepathic Download of Binary Code
• 01/02/2011 — Part 2: Updates On RAF Bentwaters Mystery - IR Anomalies and Telepathic Download of Binary Code
• 01/02/2011 — Part 3: Updates On RAF Bentwaters Mystery - IR Anomalies and Telepathic Download of Binary Code
• 01/01/2011 — Part 1: Updates On RAF Bentwaters Mystery - IR Anomalies and Telepathic Download of Binary Code

• 08/20/2010 — Part 4: 1980 Bentwaters Lights - Were They Time Travelers?
• 08/20/2010 — Part 5: USAF Col. Charles I. Halt (Ret.) Says 1980 RAF Bentwaters
• 08/20/2010 — Part 6: Is Time Travel Past and Future Possible?
• 08/07/2010 — Updated: Aerial Disc Beam Interacted with Nuclear Weapons Bunkers At Whiteman AFB
• 07/30/2010 — Part 1: 1980 RAF Bentwaters Disaster Preparedness Tech S/Sgt. Monroe Nevels Describes “Top Secret” Investigation
• 07/30/2010 — Part 2: 1980 RAF Bentwaters Disaster Preparedness Tech S/Sgt. Monroe Nevels Describes “Top Secret” Investigation
• 04/30/2010 — Part 5: Update - Bentwaters 1980, Telepathic Lights?
• 04/28/2010 — Final Part 11: RAF Bentwaters - 1986 Interview with Former Airman Larry Warren
• 04/27/2010 — Part 4: Update - Bentwaters 1980, Telepathic Lights?
• 04/21/2010 — Part 3: Update - Bentwaters 1980: Telepathic Lights?
• 04/17/2010 — Part 2: Update - Bentwaters 1980: Telepathic Lights?
• 04/16/2010 — Part 1: Update - Bentwaters 1980, Telepathic Lights?
• 04/15/2010 — Part 10: RAF Bentwaters - 1986 Interview with Former Airman Larry Warren
• 04/01/2010 — Part 9: RAF Bentwaters - 1986 Interview with Former Airman Larry Warren
• 03/23/2010 — Part 8: RAF Bentwaters - 1986 Interview with Former Airman Larry Warren
• 03/11/2010 — Part 7: RAF Bentwaters - 1986 Interview with Former Airman Larry Warren
• 03/01/2010 — Part 5: RAF Bentwaters - 1983 Hypnosis with Former Airman Larry Warren
• 03/01/2010 — Part 6: RAF Bentwaters - 1983 Hypnosis with Former Airman Larry Warren
• 02/23/2010 — Part 4: RAF Bentwaters - 1986 Interview with Former Airman Larry Warren
• 02/08/2010 — Part 3: RAF Bentwaters - 1986 Interview with Former Airman Larry Warren
• 02/01/2010 — Part 2: RAF Bentwaters - 1986 Interview with Former Airman Larry Warren
• 01/26/2010 — Part 1: RAF Bentwaters - 1986 Interview with Former Airman Larry Warren
• 08/21/2010 — Part 10: Update - Bentwaters 1980, Telepathic Lights?
• 08/21/2010 — Part 12: Update - Bentwaters 1980, Telepathic Lights?
• 07/09/2010 — High Strangeness Letters from Viewers
• 04/21/2010 — Part 3: Update - Bentwaters 1980: Telepathic Lights?
• 04/16/2010 — Part 1: Update - Bentwaters 1980, Telepathic Lights?

• 12/20/2009 — Why Has U. K. Ministry of Defence Shut Down UFO Office?
• 09/24/2009 — Former RAF Bentwaters Staff Sgt. James Penniston Recalls Black, Glassy, Triangular Craft, Symbols and Missing Time
• 09/24/2009 — Former RAF Bentwaters Airman John Burroughs - Was He Taken Into A Craft?
• 08/27/2009 — Part 4: 1980 Bentwaters Lights - Were They Time Travelers?
• 08/27/2009 — Part 5: USAF Col. Charles I. Halt (Ret.) Says 1980 RAF Bentwaters Lights and Craft Were “Extraterrestrial In Origin”
• 07/22/2009 — Part 3: 1980 RAF Bentwaters Lights and Craft Were “Extraterrestrial In Origin”
• 07/19/2009 — Part 2: 1980 RAF Bentwaters Lights and Craft Were “Extraterrestrial In Origin”
• 07/17/2009 — Part 1: 1980 RAF Bentwaters Lights and Craft Were “Extraterrestrial In Origin”

 

Websites:

May 15, 2006, declassified and released U. K. The National Archives, for hot links to UAP Executive Summary; Volume 1; Volume 2; and Volume 3.

Vol. 2 ANNEX F (Pages 16-30), Page F-4, "Potential Mental Effects On Humans": http://www.noufors.com/Documents/UAP%20in%20the%20UK%20Air%20
Defence%20Region%20-%20Volume%202/uap_vol2_pgs16to30.pdf

October 30, 2014 Earthfiles: "Updated - USAF Tech Sgt. (Ret.) John Burroughs Has Forced U. K. Ministry of Defence to Admit It Withheld At Least 18 Classified UFO Files": https://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=2243&category=Environment

May 4, 2011, Earthfiles: “8,500 More UFO Pages Released by U. K. Ministry of Defence - But RAF Bentwaters Files Are Missing”:
http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1822&category=Environment

NASA Interstellar Warp Drive Research:
http://www.gizmag.com/warp-drive-bubble-nasa-interstellar/24392/

List of all known "Cold War" nuclear bunkers and subterranean complexes in the U. K.


Credits

Copyright © 1999 - 2015 by Linda Moulton Howe.
All Rights Reserved.
www.earthfiles.com
earthfiles@earthfiles.com

 
No infringement intended. For educational purposes only.